1/5/2024 0 Comments One man band videoWhen shooting solo, you have to know what kind of situation you’re walking into. When working as a one-man band, the key to success is most often planning. What we’re going to talk about is when you’re required to act as a one-man band, how do you plan, strategize, execute that strategy and end up with good-looking and -sounding footage when you have to do everything yourself? The Key I don’t want to go too deeply into the relative merits of having a crew versus working solo, but they’re apparent to anyone who has worked with a crew as well as solo. Others I know in the field prefer working on an even larger crew of 50 to 200 positions, which are typical in a lot of episodic television and on feature films.īut as I noted earlier, in shooting my own low-budget documentaries and on a decent percentage of corporate and even some broadcast projects, I’m often called upon to act as a one-man band, meaning that I’m responsible for picture, sound, makeup, production design and often interviewing or directing by myself. Such a group gives me the benefits of being able to concentrate on doing just one job really well (directing, cinematography and interviewing are what I like doing most), while leaving the lugging of gear, setting it all up, setting lights, recording sound, hair, makeup, props, wardrobe and production design to my crew. Personally, I most enjoy working with a small crew of between five and 10 people. ![]() But the reality is, today that paradigm is shifting from working in a group to working solo. Video and film are definitely a collaborative medium and were designed to be shot with a crew, with each position filled by a person whose job it was to light a scene, shoot it with a camera and record the sound. Setting up a medium Chimera in homes and offices and not on stages with high ceilings can be tricky.Ī crew of three to five people was considered a small, minimal crew. The “one-man band” approach to video production is a phenomenon that has grown side-by-side with the advent of new smaller, lighter and simpler-to-use gear.Ī decade ago, a small documentary or corporate shoot would typically have a cameraperson, sound mixer and perhaps a PA or a gaffer as well as a producer/director/interviewer. What that all means is that one person-you-needs to know more about all aspects of the production. Even as little as a decade ago, the expense and complexity of pro video gear meant that it simply took more skilled labor to create video and cinema. The advent of web video has changed who creates video today. Gear was expensive, and the skills to use it professionally were rarer than they are today. ![]() If you were in video production in the 1980s, ’90s and early 2000s, it cost significantly more for clients to produce programming at any level. ![]() Yes, although the digital revolution has given us these benefits, there’s a downside. It’s now possible to easily and effectively edit not only on non-computer devices like tablets but to edit 4K video on our mobile phones. Heavy, heat-generating Tungsten lighting instruments have been replaced with much smaller, cooler, more flexible and versatile LED instruments. Many of us are using cameras that, for a little over $1,000, can shoot in high-quality 4:2:2 10-bit 4K-resolution formats that would have been unimaginable just a few years ago. This shoot pushed the limits of how much gear I could set up and manage solo.Īn interesting and significant by-product of the digital revolution is that most of the gear used today to create television and film is now significantly lighter, smaller, less expensive and higher-quality than anyone could have imagined 15 or 20 years ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |